Latin American Art Essay

craft is a assortment of expression. Paintings are a form of visual art. Artists are the creators of visual forms of communication and their art full treatment articulate issue what is in their hearts and minds. Art in individually form, music, mold or dance is nonetheless a language of the soul of the artist. Art of a period is a depiction and impact of the genial, political, religious, cultural, traditional, geographical and social system prevalent at the time. Like the transformation of a soul with circumstances and experience, paintings too exhibit change in their reference book in form, prevail over, and choice of colors, technique and drift.Latin American art grew through the age of ancient folklore, to a combination of modernism to rebel against imperialism, colonialism, terrorism and dominance of the occidental world surpassing the turbulence played by history with the Latin American countries. They were plundered and conquered innumerable times and work on today they fight for their personal identity which is dissolving into the global world. The name of Mexican Artist Diego Rivera is famous as the master of cubism of the early 20 century. His works have gained immense popularity for their modernism and retention of originality.Diego was fascinated by the mod style of painting led by celebrated Spaniard Pablo Picasso in the cubistic paintings by Diego so he mastered that style from 1913 and developed it in his later works. The Zapatista Landscape is a painting in the same style. It is a landscape of the city of Zapatista. Juxtaposed with the geographical terrain of Zapatista, are the bold and lovely pictures of guns, fragments of human features in the backdrop of nature. Bold lines are absent besides the distinction of shapes is vivid in the painting. There is an indication of texture except the strokes of the brush are smooth.The landscape showers a powerful beam of noctilucent light from above in the painting. Colors are no n delineative solely expressive. Apt to its time, the landscape breaks rapidly estimable like the devastation and damage of the culture and traditions at the mercy of those who ruled over them then. The Zapatista landscape, by Diego Rivera, the master of cubism, is my choice because it has a tremendous visual impact and bursts with vibrant colors. The second image of another artist of the period is that of Joaquin Torres Garcia. His abstract metaphysical work captivates the viewer because of its grid shapes and different style.His paintings suppose like murals on a wall, where geometrical shapes are made to look unique by the effect of metallic colors. Numbers, dimensions and shapes comp revoke his visual portrayal. Torres Garcia developed his own style called the constructivist Art in the early 20 century. He returned to his roots aft(prenominal) several years in Europe and America. A man without any family ties, Joaquin was brave and confident to try out new styles of his own only wanted to preserve the tribal art and geometrical organization of expressions just like the Inca Civilization and Peruvian art.He used the golden call up to express his art. The distinct feature of his paintings is their irregular grid average and the signs embed into each. His paintings look as though they have been made on walls and not on canvas. The play of light and shade is subtle. His colors are delineative but they capture the eye by their abstract subjects. His paintings are very(prenominal) fascinating as we do not understand their theme at first instance. They make you look at them for hours and to penetrate into every enlarge to understand the interesting pass on from the mind of Garcia.There is a common chord dimensional effect but there is no perspective to his paintings. They look flat but the grid looks as though each gear up is an raised metal sheet with figures and forms on it. There is a brace of spatial relationship but no attempt at creating il lusions. The splendor of metals is an unusual method of Garcias works. His creations speak about spirituality, religion, meditation and universality. His bass belief in traditions of ancient civilizations like the Inca, surfaces clearly in his works. They correspond the resistance he felt towards the dominance of European art.His works jounce feelings of identity crisis of the Latin American nation and rebellion against the degradation of their culture. His subject is not human forms but a connection to the universe and the timelessness of the soul. The marvel of the both different paintings is their diverse subject, theme, style, color schemes and effects. But the marrow is unmistakably the same. Search of identities Unity amidst diversity How do they stand out alone and yet combine to form such a crocked pair? The Zapatista by Diego Rivera is like a bright flower fight for survival and fighting its rough terrain.It evokes a feeling of admiration for an item-by-items self esteem. The painting by Joaquin Torres Garcia, with its grid base and rough metallic colors evokes a respect for some one who is essay to make a place for himself in a world that refuses him the identity and dignity he deserves. Disparity, unrest, between classes of society, in the third world and western countries, the message of rebellion, liberty from suppression by power of education, wealth, industry and might, is the shoddy and clear evocation of both the works.The Zapatista, Diegos work promotes a message of patriotism through his painting, while Joaquin achieves it by his systematic grid base in his work. The grid base gives a rational approach to art while the abstract forms connect creativity to the ultimate unknown realms of the Universe. fair landscape of Zapatista projects peace and harmony with its blue sky, brown mountains and green trees but is superimposed by brightly colored pictures of guns and dark suspicious look of the innocent citizens, of the revolutiona ries who were desperate to break free from the ramshackle of their present.Garcia vividly demarcates visual matter by geometrical grids, blended into abstract forms and Diego uses cubism to arouse feelings in his work. But there is a harmony of thought which binds both these paintings into a single message. That of an uprising surging in the hearts of sensitive people of Latin America and their struggle to retain their identity in the acclivitous new world. Together they resonate the same ultimate yearning of mankind. To rise up above time and to live up to eternity. Stare at them and they speak out to you. Call you towards them and throw you back if you do not understand the message they are giving.Zapatista landscape beckons all those who have migrated to confluent countries in quest of their unfulfilled dreams. It brings out sighs of nostalgia and tears of rage, betrayal and hero-worship when you look at it. Garcias work attracts you like a attractive feature to metal. The lu strous metallic shine with abstract intriguing signs, get embossed on your mind. They lead you to believe that art and creativity are a science and can be portrayed through numbers. See each one in a different light and when together they herald the same story. Like a newly married couple, coming from two different corners of the world.With two different upbringings but united for life to try out the same purpose. That of procreation. Of giving birth to a new world, full of hope, comfort and universal bliss. Not just for themselves but for the Universe as a whole.Works CitedDiego Rivera (Mexico), Zapatista Landscape, 1915, 29 November 2008. Joaquin Torres-Garcia (Uruguay), Abstract Metaphysical Forms, 1930, 29 November 2008