Macduff vs. Macbeth: a True Case of Good vs. Evil?

Macduff vs. Macbeth A dead on target Instance of Good vs. Evil? At the end of the play Macbeth, Macduff kills Macbeth in a scene easily read as the victory of mature over evil, that is this accurate? Is Macbeth comp allowely evil? Is Macduff completely goodness? Or is there an in between? I believe that Macduff is good, but there is definitely an in-between with Macbeth. I see Macduff as cosmos a good person. He does everything he can to improve the secern that Scotland is in. When he flees to England and leaves his family behind, roughly people may interpret it as him doing hopeless since his family is slaughtered in his absence.I do not see it this way. I believe Macduff is doing what he thinks is best for Scotland when he flees to England. That is to get Malcolm to come back and take his just place as king of Scotland. This is evident when Macduff is in England talking to Malcolm. Malcolm says let us seek out some desolate shade, and there/ express feelings our sad bosoms empty (4. 31-2, pageboy 70). essentially, he is feels sorry for the advance into which Scotland has fallen since Macbeth has become king. To this Macduff replies Let us rather hold spry the mortal sword, and analogous good men bestride our down-falln birthdom (4. 3-4, Page 71). This translates to let us rather hold fast the deadly sword, and like good men protectively stand over our native land. Basically what Macduff is trying to say is that instead of crying for Scotland, they should fight for their land to bring down her back to the state they k invigorated and loved. Further on into this same conversation, there is still proof that Macduff was seen as good. He tells Malcolm I am not perfidious to which Malcolm replies but Macbeth is 4. 318-19, Page 71).This also goes toward the argument of Macbeth being evil. He is seen as treacherous and a tyrant. He brings sadness to Scotland. Macduff says that each new morn/New widows howl, new orphans cry, new sorrow/Strike heaven o n the face (4. 3 4-6, Page 71). This is just a ghost of how bad the state of Scotland has gotten. Macbeth is also evil in that he kill and framed people to become king of Scotland. He murdered the authoritative king, Duncan, and made it appear that the guards in his chambers of the crime.He was told by the Weird Sisters that he would be king. He was just too impatient to wait his bust and turned to murder instead. Although he did do a lot of things that could be considered evil, I do not believe that Macbeth was all told evil. He was intrepid and seen as a hero in the war against Norway. This heroism notwithstanding got him the title of Thane of Cawdor. Banquo didnt seem displeased at the prophecies of Macbeth becoming Thane of Cawdor and King. If Macbeth was evil, Banquo would apply been displeased with this.He can also be seen as not wholly evil because he is hesitant in his plot to kill the king. peeress Macbeth has to help to convince him to do it. If he was wholly evil , he would piss had no hesitation in murdering someone for his own gain. Due to the scuffle of good and evil in the character of Macbeth, there is definitely some gray area to the play. I think this gray area adds information to the play. Not everyone is interested in straight good and evil. Some elect a round, conflicted character such as provided by the character of Macbeth.