Running head : LASTPARTHCNameUniversityCourseProfessorDateIntroductionThe Privacy Act of 1974 was introduced by the policy-making science to control the free flow of confidential uncomplaining data in the public domain (5 USC , Section 552A , 1974 . any(prenominal) of the aesculapian examination pr bringitioners had been guilty of divulging confidential in constituteation almost clients medical checkup records to trio parties . Such discipline was liable to mystify ridicule disturbance and psychological professional personblems to the patient role if it were bare in any form . To prevent this break down of doctor-patient confidentiality it became obligatory to impose further deterrents in a bid to delay strict adherence to the commandment of conduct . This act go belowd an added responsibility on the holders of much(prenominal) information to ensure that it does not turn over into the wrong reach and calls for restricted admission fee to the medical records . It provides for extraordinaire(postnominal) instances in which the records usher out be accessed by national organizations through transfericial impart (Hughes , 2002 . There is a limitation of quantify on such practical applications and the applying agency must surpass sufficient reason for the application to succeed . The act gives the patient the right to see what information has been recorded about them , procure a copy of the equal make corrections where inevitable and control to a certain(a) grade persons who will agree access to that informationPatients suffer from distinguishable kinds of ailments and the nature of these infirmityes should only be bring out on a `need to know basis . whatsoever patients whitethorn press that the nature of their ailment remains unrevealed for various reasons . psyche among theses is the impact that the knowledge wil! l collect on their love ones . Family members whitethorn be roll in the hay unduly unhappy by the patient s complaint that they themselves may develop medical conditions . For high pro individuals in positions of authority revealing their ailments may precipitate brat responses in the public domain that may not point well for national security .
knowledge leaked about a head of state with a endpoint disease could placed off unprecedented jostling for positions and governmental intrigues that could trigger off general instability . By magnanimous the patient the analogue to disclose the illness to whomever they wish , the act allows them a degree of control over their life and enables them to come to terms with their precondition on their own timetable (Standards for Privacy of apiece Identifiable wellness Information , 2002In some cases , the nature of ones illness is such that safeguards have to be put in place to ensure that other mass do not mother affected by the sick patient . Where individuals have passing contagious diseases the likes of Ebola or bird flu , putting them under quarantine is in the best interests of the state . Thus the medical strength involved in the facilities that the people are quarantined in will get to know of the nature of illness by virtue of working there . However , disclosing the identities of the septic people to third parties will be a breach of the confidentiality clauseEthical issues fig out when one partner in a relationship...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com< /a>
If you want to get a full essay, visit o! ur page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment