Corporate Governance And Regulation Ethic - Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss about the Corporate Governance And Regulation Ethic. Answer: Introduction: Corporate governance is the structure of policies and method of business which a company follows. It demonstrates the process of power and responsibility that moves between board of directors, managers, CEO and all the shareholders of a company (Tricker Tricker, 2015). The basic structure of the system comprises of shareholders vote and authorizes a team of board of directors, who are given financial responsibilities for the interest of the shareholders. The team then employs a CEO, who employs management team and further progress takes place. A chain is created according to the distribution of power and responsibilities. The internal rules are created about the whole process, and they are needed to be maintained to run a company efficiently. It is a set of ethics that needs to be maintained. The ethics are maintained for financial growth of the company and for maintaining healthy relationship among all the staffs within company. Violating these ethics has resulted in collapsing and financial losses for many companies. Sometimes, proper ethics are not maintained within a company. This report highlights on the basic rules or ethics of corporate governance and how the system works. There will be analysis on why these ethics need to be followed and how the methods are implemented in a company. There will be discussions on benefits and ethical issues of corporate governance. There will be evaluation about two companies violating ethics and about how they collapsed due to this. Lastly, there will be discussion on how the ethics can be improved and the future aspects of the ethics which can benefit the companies further. Discussions: Corporate governance and ethics both run with each other for maintaining a standard for running a company. The difference between them is that the ethics are more logical and properly appropriate standards that a corporation maintains for functioning wisely, where corporate governance methods are the ways by which a corporation makes the efforts to be as ethical as possible while maintaining a financial growth. The corporate governance and ethics varies according to different types of business. There are difference in governance and ethics of private companies and public companies. Ethics for corporate governance: In 2004, the ethics for the government pension fund was formed. They comprise of three documents they are as follows: The UN Global compact: It as introduced in 2000 and comprises of ten basic theories for human rights, anti corruption, the labors and working environment (Voegtlin Pless, 2014). The theories or principles are as follows: The human rights should be respected and they should not be violated. Child labors, forced labor and injustice to employers should be eased totally. Corruption, fraud in work place and bribery should be eliminated. The environmental challenges should be faced properly and environmental responsibilities should be promoted with great effort. The OECD Principles of Corporate Governance: It was formed in 2004 and consists of document that covers efficient framework for corporate governance, the interests of all the shareholders and owners, impartial methods for all the shareholders, acknowledgement and transparency within the staffs and obligations of the board of directors (Siems Alvarez-Macotela, 2014). The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: It was formed in 2000. This document consists of proposals in operations like transparency, relation within employers and employees, and the working environment, fighting against bribery and corruptions, interests of the consumers, departments of science and technology and competition in the markets (Tergeist, 2016). Principles for Corporate Governance and the Protection of Financial Assets: It was formed in 2004 and consists of promoting rights of the owners and built excellent corporate governance, making proper strategies and communications within the company, preparing structure of the company boards and long term continuity of functioning of the company (Gitman, Juchau Flanagan, 2015). The ethics for the management of funds: For better management of companys financial department, ethical guidelines for some issues have been addressed. They are as follows: For promoting financial returns for a long terms basis, the corporate governance that comprises of the UN global compact, the OECD guidelines for multinational companies and the OECD principles for corporate governance are implemented. Production of weapons by the companies from their funds either by themselves or through other individuals results in breaching of main human principles. Prohibition of companies from investment areas where risk of violating human rights and individual rights in rivalry situations are found along with corruption, environmental deteriorations. The finance ministry is responsible to take care of the funds to be managed in genuine ethical manner. The theories of corporate governance: There are several theories related to corporate governance which describes the operating methods of the boards and the process by which decisions are made by the directors of a company. There are six theories of corporate governance stated by Stiles and Taylor, out of which three theories have standard characters. The theories are as follows: Agency theory: Agency theory was found from the work of Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means. It was found to trace on the problems of individual greed. Call agency cost is all about assigning managers to maintain financial departments which are not in their planning. In case of business where the owner is the manager, this cost does not arrive (Bosse Philips, 2016). That is the reason the governance problem in private and public companies are different from each other. These problems cannot be totally avoided but if some active measures are taken they can be limited. To control these issues, the public companies have introduced incentives in salaries for the managers. Growing implementation of stock options and impartiality based payment methods help in controlling the agency costs. These opportunities to earn more money help the managers to focus on their individual incomes through the benefits provided by the company. In case of, large sector public organizations, the shareholders recr uit the directors to look after the working of the managers which increases the agency costs. Stakeholder theory: This theory is mainly practiced in Japan and continental European countries like Germany. In this theory, about half membership seats for the board of directors are allotted for the representatives of the employees (Pige, 2017). This theory mentions that bankers of the company and other shareholders should have seats in board of directors. This theory objects to the expectation that only directors and managers have duty towards the owner of the company. Stewardship theory: This theory proposes that in board practice, instructions are inspired more than personal finance. According to the psychology of a company, the suggestion is that self belief and fulfillment emerge in the decision making. In this theory, the directors should look on the interests of the employees bigger than their self interest (Cho, Huang Padmanabhan, 2014). But in most of the outcome, the theory is mute and the director finds other ways for guiding principles. When a seat is secured by a shareholder among the board of directors, the director needs to follow the aims of the shareholder as set on the company law. Ethical frameworks for governance: The theories discussed corporate governance are encircled in ethics as significant and idealized. The right action can be decided on assessing the benefits derived from the theories and by following more accurate rules what may be result of the actions taken. But there is meaningful thinking that which have important roles in maintaining corporate governance which is known as ethical egoism (Dahlbeck, 2016). In this system, an individual carries on the work which is suitable for him without thinking the outcomes for others (Too Weaver, 2014). The CEO attempts to find maximum personal profits. The role that corporate governance maintains is curbing the actions of the CEOs without spoiling their working interests. In the agency theory, the board negotiates with the CEO and policies are paid to the other members of the management team to create a way for common results. Benefits of corporate governance and ethics: The benefits of corporate governance and ethics are as follows: Improved reputation of a company: Implementing corporate governance helps in boosting the reputation of a company. Adding corporate governance results in joining of more stakeholders who will be interested to work with that company. Strong controls in the company among board of directors, managers and employees can attract many stakeholders to invest in the company (Saeidi et al., 2015). Through sharing of internal information with the stakeholder increases transparency within the company, which in turn makes the people or customers more confident about the company. Less fine and penalties: The benefit of corporate governance includes following policies which requires the company to implement strategies to stay flexible with all the local and national rules and laws to run a company. In corporate governance, the board of directors or managers needs to handle the companys rule in employing or recruitment policies before hiring any staffs (Arlen Kahan, 2016). It might require the companys accounting department to go through an audit by an independent auditor once or twice in a year. Decrease in conflicts and fraud within a company: Implementation of corporate governance helps in restricting the possibility for bad behavior or by employees by applying some rules to decrease frauds and bribes (DeZoort Harrison, 2016). In corporate governance, a company might set a rule which the company management needs to sign to avoid any conflicts in which the members have their own personal interests. For example, the company might not allow loans for the family members of the management team or recruiting any family member of the team. Some external audits are made and signed by the management team members to prevent any frauds within the company. Reducing or preventing cyber attacks: Having a proper plan of cyber security within a company can prevent any threats of cyber attacks. Corporate governance for maintaining cyber security of a company needs to be followed for preventing any types of threats. Example of two companies violating corporate governance and ethics: Violating corporate governance and ethics can lead to collapsing and financial losses for many companies. WorldCom and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities are two companies that faced terrible consequence for violating the ethics. These two incidents shook the whole nation and resulted in huge financial losses. In 2005, WorldCom a telecommunication company failed terribly and felt into bankruptcy and became one of the biggest financial frauds in the history. Bernard Ebbers, the former CEO of the company was accused for the financial fraud and was put into prison for 25 years (Leighton, 2015). In the 15 years of operations, the company made a high financial growth. The company had business over 65 countries (Bhasin, 2016). The United States Securities and Exchange Commission took information about financial procedures and loan provided to the officers of the WorldCom (Gottschalk, 2018). The company then cut down 3700 jobs of their employees. This affected the credit ratings of WorldCom (Trautman, 2016). An investigation team was set up by US government to find out the truth about the scandal. Bernard Ebbers stepped down from the role of CEO. It was later revealed that the company has provided him $ 339.7 million to clear the debt of the loan that he took for buying his shares. The company la ter announced that a huge loss occurred for wrong accounting of about $ 3.8 billion (Chorafas, 2015). Then, they cut down more 17,000 jobs which was greater than 20 % of total workforce. The share price of the company dropped down more than 80 %. Several suits were filed against the company which further made the company collapse. The chief financial officer, Scott Sullivan and the controller David Myers were also arrested and were put into 65 years of imprisonment (Wisner Brown, 2015). These consequences could have been avoided if the company maintained ethical corporate governance. Breaching corporate governance by CEO Bernard resulted in the financial loss. At the early stage of operations, Bernards decisions were widely appreciated as it resulted in substantial financial growth of the company. But at later stages, he produced fake images of himself to the companys board of directors, employees and also to the market. He made unrealistic promises and focused on building his pers onal financial growth without paying attention on the possible consequences that the company could face. When his personal finance started suffering he made efforts to increase the stock price of WorldCom. Still, he could not avoid financial losses of the company. It was later found out that the chief financial officer was the main culprit behind this fraud. It was clear that Bernard was aware of the full fraud and the way it was implemented. A proper corporate governance and ethics should have been followed to prevent any losses. Another big financial fraud was conducted in Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, which shook the entire world (Stolowy et al., 2014). The company implemented different techniques for duping people with their money which is known as Ponzi schemes (Baucus Mitteness, 2016). The CEO of the company Bernard L. Madoff monitored the whole scheme for more than 15 years. He was arrested for the fraud and begged guilty for duping billions of US dollars. The company was founded as an investment firm in 1960 (Lewis, 2016). After implementing some latest computer technologies, it became on the largest companies in the US. In this company, the investors could keep their money in a savings fund in return they used to receive an amount of above ten percent interest. This made the company run one of the biggest Ponzi scheme in the world. For running a Ponzi scheme, the companies mainly return the money of the old investors by receiving money from new investors. This process was also applied by B ernard L. Madoff investment securities. A variety of techniques were applied to ensure that the scam could not be disclosed by any means. Madoff used to sell all the financial instruments of the company at each months end which ensured that the fund only report the cash of the investors. The investors could not access their online transaction of money rather a mail was sent to them every month about their information of the account and balances. Despite of so much prevention, the scam was finally revealed in 2008 which completely destroyed the existence of the company. Andrew Bernard and Mark Bernard, the two sons of Bernard Maddoff finally revealed the scam and Madoff was arrested on December 2008. In 2009 he was charged with all the charges and sent to 150 years of imprisonment (Azim Azam, 2016). Being a moral agent of the company, he needed to ensure the correct way for the growth of the company rather he took the wrong way and breached the ethics to run a company efficiently. T he progress of a company depends on the behavior of the moral agents and how they find the honest way for maintaining company ethics. Ethical issues in corporate governance and the future prospects: To maintain proper corporate governance in a company, some ethics needs to be maintained. Violating these ethics can result in big losses and frauds as stated by two examples discussed above. The conflict of interest within a company needs to be avoided to prevent staffs taking personal advantages which can result in the disadvantages of the company. The board members can be answerable to conflicts of interest in different ways. Another ethical issue for a company is to maintain transparency among all the staffs and shareholders. Maintaining transparency helps the stakeholders to have full and accurate information of the company, its way of conducting business and all the negative and positive aspects of the company. Transparency is extremely important to recognize all the shareholders so that proper communications occurs between them and full rights are provided to each shareholder (Levit Malenko, 2016). Breaching this ethics can result in conflict among the board members and share holder and can result in downfall of the company. Another ethics which is extremely important is accountability (Christensen et al., 2015). This is the way the board members answers to the stakeholders about the financial performance of the company and the different processes by which they are achieved. Accountability includes a process which is of two ways. Many organizations such as trade unions demands on better accountability. The main focus in this ethics is for better relationship between the board of a company and its shareholders. All these ethics need to be maintained for better corporate governance of a company. The future of all the organizations could be better if these ethics are improved further according to the market demands. The government of all the countries should keep an eye on all the private and public companies so that the corporate governance and ethics are not violated and big frauds like that of WorldCom and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities are not repeated. With the advancement of technologies and increasing cyber crimes, it is necessary to implement laws that are as strong as the technologies. Conclusions: Corporate governance and ethics are the most important rules that all the organizations need to follow for improving their business and preventing any shorts of financial and non financial frauds. These ethics need to be followed to maintain better relationships between shareholders, board of directors and employees of a company. The benefits associated with these ethics are extremely useful for improving financial and non-financial aspects of a company. Violation of company ethics has resulted in fallout and financial losses of many companies around the world. Proper transparency and accountability needs to be maintained for avoiding any short of conflicts among the members of a company. Conflicts of interest need to be avoided to have smooth operations within a company. Applying more advanced, planned and secured corporate governance and ethics will lead to better business process of a company and prevent any further frauds. This report focused on the use of corporate governance an d ethics for better functioning of a company. There are discussions on the benefits of implementation of the ethics. The ethics and the theories related to corporate governance have been evaluated further. The ethics for management of funds has been discussed. The ethical frameworks have been evaluated further. Examples of two companies which violated corporate governance and how these resulted in collapsing of these companies have been discussed. Lastly, the ethical issues of corporate governance and the future aspects have been discussed. References: Arlen, J., Kahan, M. (2016). Corporate Governance Regulation Through Non-Prosecution. Azim, M., Azam, M. (2016). Bernard Madoff's' Ponzi scheme': Fraudulent behaviour and the role of auditors.Accountancy Business and the Public Interest,15(122-137). Baucus, M. S., Mitteness, C. R. (2016). Crowdfrauding: Avoiding Ponzi entrepreneurs when investing in new ventures.Business horizons,59(1), 37-50. Bhasin, M. L. (2016). The Untimely Demise of Satyam Computers Limited: A Revisit to the Indias Enron.International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research,5(5), 6-24. Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A. (2016). Agency theory and bounded self-interest.Academy of Management Review,41(2), 276-297. Cho, K. R., Huang, C. H., Padmanabhan, P. (2014). Foreign ownership mode, executive compensation structure, and corporate governance: Has the literature missed an important link? Evidence from Taiwanese firms.International Business Review,23(2), 371-380. Chorafas, D. N. (2015). Parmalat: The Hedge Fund with Dairy Products on the Side. InBusiness Efficiency and Ethics(pp. 203-224). Palgrave Macmillan US. Christensen, J., Kent, P., Routledge, J., Stewart, J. (2015). Do corporate governance recommendations improve the performance and accountability of small listed companies?.Accounting Finance,55(1), 133-164. Dahlbeck, J. (2016). Character education and ethical egoism: Spinoza on self-preservation as the foundation of virtue. DeZoort, F. T., Harrison, P. D. (2016). Understanding auditors sense of responsibility for detecting fraud within organizations.Journal of Business Ethics, 1-18. Gitman, L. J., Juchau, R., Flanagan, J. (2015).Principles of managerial finance. Pearson Higher Education AU. Gottschalk, P. (2018). Sample of US Investigation Reports. InInvestigating White-Collar Crime(pp. 95-119). Springer, Cham. Leighton, P. (2015). Ebbers25 year sentence for WorldCom fraud upheld. good.Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison: A Reader, 96. Levit, D., Malenko, N. (2016). The labor market for directors and externalities in corporate governance.The Journal of Finance,71(2), 775-808. Lewis, L. S. (2016).Bernard Madoff and His Accomplices: Anatomy of a Con: Anatomy of a Con. ABC-CLIO. Pig, B. (2017). Stakeholder theory and corporate governance: the nature of the board information.Management: journal of contemporary management issues,7(1), 1-17. Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction.Journal of Business Research,68(2), 341-350. Siems, M. M., Alvarez-Macotela, O. (2014). The OECD Principles of Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: a successful example of networked governance?. InNetworked Governance, Transnational Business and the Law(pp. 257-284). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Stolowy, H., Messner, M., Jeanjean, T., Richard Baker, C. (2014). The construction of a trustworthy investment opportunity: Insights from the Madoff fraud.Contemporary Accounting Research,31(2), 354-397. Tergeist, P. (2016).The OECD Guidelines for multinational enterprises. Kluwer Law International. Too, E. G., Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance.International Journal of Project Management,32(8), 1382-1394. Trautman, L. J. (2016). Who Sits on Texas Corporate Boards: Texas Corporate Directors: Who They Are What They Do.Hous. Bus. Tax LJ,16, 44. Tricker, R. B., Tricker, R. I. (2015).Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press, USA. Voegtlin, C., Pless, N. M. (2014). Global governance: CSR and the role of the UN Global Compact.Journal of Business Ethics,122(2), 179-191. Wisner, D. L., Brown, B. A. (2015). Corporate Toxicity: The WorldCom/MCI Scandal.